Join ECCO!

Vacancies for PhDs, postdocs and other positions will be posted online soon. Want to stay informed? Leave your contact details here.

Submenu

Literature list

[1] Aalbers 2017. The Variegated Financialization of Housing. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 41: 542-554. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.12522
[2] Albareda & Sison, 2020. Commons Organizing: Embedding Common Good and Institutions for Collective Action. Insights from Ethics and Economics. Journal of Business Ethics 166, 727–743. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-020-04580-8
[3] Avelino, Dumitru, Cipolla, Kunze, & Wittmayer 2019. Translocal empowerment in transformative social innovation networks. European Planning Studies 28(5), 955–977. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2019.1578339
[4] Axon 2020. The socio-cultural dimensions of community-based sustainability: Implications for transformational change. Journal of Cleaner Production 266, 121933. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121933
[5] Bauwens, Schraven, Drewing, Radtke, Holstenkamp, Gotchev & Yildiz 2022. Conceptualizing community in energy systems: A systematic review of 183 definitions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 156, 111999. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111999
[6] Bentzen, Sørensen & Torfing 2020. Strengthening Public Service Production, Administrative Problem Solving and Political Leadership through Co-creation of Innovative Public Value Outcomes? The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal 25(1) 4. https://edu.nl/ymghk
[7] Berkers et al. 2024. Agenda Key Enabling Methodologies 2024-2027. https://edu.nl/wmbmc
[8] Blok 2024. Collective action by citizens’ initiatives: citizens’ initiatives as reflections of the capacity for collective action and a civil society. https://edu.nl/m98bq
[9] Bollier & Helfrich 2019. Free, fair, and alive : the insurgent power of the commons. https://edu.nl/rqhv3
Bouman, Steg & Kiers 2018. Measuring Values in Environmental Research: A Test of an Environmental Portrait Value Questionnaire. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00564
[11] Bovens, Tiemeijer, Keizer, Hulscher, de Boer & Codrington 2023. Grip. Het maatschappelijke belang van persoonlijke controle. https://edu.nl/wxmmd
[12] Boyle, Hainey, Connolly, Gray, Earp, Ott, Lim, Ninaus, Ribeiro & Pereira 2016. An update to the systematic literature review of empirical evidence of the impacts and outcomes of computer games and serious games. Computers & Education 94, 178-192. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.003
[13] Bristow, Bell, Wamsler, Björkman, Tickell, Kim & Scharmer 2024. The System Within: addressing the inner dimensions of sustainability and systems change. The Club of Rome. Earth4All: deep-dive paper 17. https://edu.nl/qxewy
[14] Broekhuizen & Michels 2017. Non-participatie in de doe-democratie. Bestuurswetenschappen 71:2. DOI: 10.5553/Bw/016571942017071002003
[15] Brysch & Czischke 2022. Affordability through design: the role of building costs in collaborative housing. Housing Studies 37(10), 1800–1820. DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2021.2009778
[16] Budd, Lamare & Timming 2018. Learning about Democracy at Work: Cross-National Evidence on Individual Employee Voice Influencing Political Participation in Civil Society. ILR Review 71(4), 956-985. DOI: 10.1177/0019793917746619
[17] Cajaiba-Santana 2014. Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 82, 42-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.de .05.008
[18] Carlo &Randall 2002. The Development of a Measure of Prosocial Behaviors for Late Adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 31, 31–44. DOI: 10.1023/A:1014033032440
[19] Checkland & Scholes 1999. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. https://edu.nl/wxtna
[20] Ciplet & Harrison 2020. Transition tensions: mapping conflicts in movements for a just and sustainable transition. Environmental Politics 29(3), 435–456. DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2019.1595883
[21] Coolen & Hoekstra 2001. Values as determinants of preferences for housing attributes. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 16, 285–306. DOI: 10.1023/A:1012587323814
[22] Czischke, Peute & Brysch 2023. Together: Towards Collaborative Living. DOI: 10.59490/mg.80
[23] Czischke & Huisman 2018. Integration through Collaborative Housing? Dutch Starters and Refugees Forming Self-Managing Communities in Amsterdam. Urban Planning 3(4), 156-165. DOI: 10.17645/up.v3i4.1727
[24] De Moor 2013. Homo Cooperans. Instituties voor collectieve actie en de solidaire samenleving. https://edu.nl/uvwxc
[25] De Moor 2023. Shakeholder society? Social enterprises, citizens and collective action in the community economy. https://edu.nl/fuh43
[26] De Moor 2024. Hoe waarde weerbaar wordt. Bouwen aan de gemeenschapseconomie in Rotterdam. https://edu.nl/uyw6a
[27] De Moor et al. 2020. Krachtiger als collectief. Uitdagingen van burgercollectieven in Nederland, anno 2020. https://edu.nl/y8cgk
[28] Den Haan & Van der Voort 2018. On Evaluating Social Learning Outcomes of Serious Games to Collaboratively Address Sustainability Problems: A Literature Review. Sustainability 10, 4529. DOI: 10.3390/su10124529
[29] Doolittle & Faul 2013. Civic Engagement Scale: A Validation Study. Sage Open 3(3). DOI: 10.1177/2158244013495542
[30] Duijn, van Buuren, Edelenbos, van Popering-Verkerk & Van Meerkerk 2019. Community-based initiatives in the Dutch water domain: the challenge of double helix alignment. International Journal of Water Resources Development 35(3), 383–403. DOI: 10.1080/07900627.2019.1575189
[31] Edelenbos & van Meerkerk eds. 2016. Critical Reflections on Interactive Governance. Self-organization and Participation in Public Governance. DOI: 10.4337/9781783479078
[32] Edelenbos, van Meerkerk & Schenk 2018. The Evolution of Community Self-Organization in Interaction With Government Institutions: Cross-Case Insights From Three Countries. The American Review of Public Administration 48(1), 52-66. DOI: 10.1177/0275074016651142
[33] Engbersen, Rusinovic, et al. 2021. De maatschappelijke impact van COVID-19 in Amsterdam, Den Haag, Rotterdam & Nederland. Vijfde meting. https://www.eur.nl/essb/media/99176
[34] Farmer & Foley 2009. The economy needs agent-based modelling. Nature 460, 685–686. https://edu.nl/mq7wh
[35] Feinberg, Hooijschuur, Rogge, Ghorbani, & Herder 2021. Sustaining Collective Action in Urban Community Gardens. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 24(3)3. DOI: 10.18564/jasss.4506
[36] Feola 2016. Translocal grassroots movements and the geography of sustainability transitions: the case of the Transition Towns Network. 7th International Sustainability Transitions (IST) Conference. https://edu.nl/n4xqj
[37] Feola & Nunes 2014. Success and failure of grassroots innovations for addressing climate change: The case of the Transition Movement. Global Environmental Change 24, 232-250. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.11.011
[38] Ferreri & Vidal 2021. Public-cooperative policy mechanisms for housing commons. International Journal of Housing Policy 22(2), 149–173. DOI: 10.1080/19491247.2021.1877888
[39] Foley & Polanyi 2006. Workplace Democracy: Why Bother? Economic and Industrial Democracy 27(1), 173-191. DOI: 10.1177/0143831X06060595
[40] Fransen et al. 2022. The emergence of Urban Community Resilience Initiatives During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An International Exploratory Study. The European Journal of Development Research 34, 432–454. DOI: 10.1057/s41287-020-00348-y
[41] Ghorbani & Bravo 2016. Managing the commons: a simple model of the emergence of institutions through collective action. International Journal of the Commons 10(1), 200-219. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.606
[42] Goddard, Hazelkorn, Kempton & Vallance eds. 2016. The Civic University. The Policy and Leadership Challenges. DOI: 10.4337/9781784717728
[43] Goedkoop, Jans, et al. 2023. Report Correlational Longitudinal Studies. Relations between involvement in energy communities and energy citizenship. https://online-raketen.at/sites/site0261/media/downloads/d4.3_report_correlational_longitudinal_studies_website_2.pdf
[44] Grenni, Horlings, et al. 2020. The inner dimension of sustainability transformation: how sense of place and values can support sustainable place-shaping. Sustainability Science 15, 411–422. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-019-00743-3
[45] Hecker, Haklay, Bowser, Makuch, Vogel & Bonn eds. 2018. Citizen Science: Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy. www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv550cf2
[46] Hamann et al. 2024. Hamann, Wullenkord, Reese & van Zomeren 2024. Believing That We Can Change Our World for the Better: A Triple-A (Agent-Action-Aim) Framework of Self-Efficacy Beliefs in the Context of Collective Social and Ecological Aims. Personality and Social Psychology Review 28(1), 11-53. DOI: 10.1177/10888683231178056
[47] Hilbers 2024. Citizens' values and tough trade-off choices in road infrastructure planning: developing tools and methods to enrich intelligence and improve context-sensitive road infrastructure design. DOI: 10.33612/diss.993565737
[48] Horlings et al. 2020. Exploring the transformative capacity of place-shaping practices. Sustainability Science 15, 353–362. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-020-00787-w
[49] Horlings 2015. The inner dimension of sustainability: personal and cultural values. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 14, 163-169. DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.06.006
[50] Horlings & Wills 2024. Subnational leadership in response to environment and climate change. Regional Studies, 1–13. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2024.2399264
[51] Humphris, Horlings, et al. 2022. Getting deep into things. Deep mapping in a 'vacant' landscape. In: Franklin 2022. Co-creativity and Engaged Scholarship. https://recoms.eu/recoms-book
[52] Igalla, Edelenbos & van Meerkerk 2021. Institutionalization or interaction: Which organizational factors help community-based initiatives acquire government support? Public administration 99(4), 803-831. DOI: 10.1111/padm.12728
[53] Itten, Sherry-Brennan, Hoppe, Sundaram & Devine-Wright 2021. Co-creation as a social process for unlocking sustainable heating transitions in Europe. Energy Research & Social Science 74, 101956. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.101956
[54] Jans, Postmes & van Oudenhoven-van der Zee 2011. Social identity formation: Diversity and groupiness. Paper presented at Invited talk at the Intergroup lab of the social psychology department, Storrs. https://edu.nl/xpk9u
[55] Jans 2021. Changing environmental behaviour from the bottom up: The formation of pro-environmental social identities. Journal of Environmental Psychology 73, 101531. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101531
[56] Jans, Djoera & Sloot 2023. Kunnen lokale energie-initiatieven mensen motiveren voor een duurzame energietransitie? Real Estate Research Quarterly 22(4), 110-118. https://edu.nl/rg6wd
[57] Jans et al. 2025, forthcoming. Harnessing Shared Identity. In: Research Handbook on Low-Carbon Communities.
[58] Janssen & Ostrom 2006. Empirically Based, Agent-based models. Ecology and Society 11(2). https://www.jstor.org/stable/26265994
[59] Jensen & Stender 2024. Developer-driven co-housing in Denmark: strengths and weaknesses compared to resident-driven co-housing. Urban Research & Practice, 1–20. DOI: 10.1080/17535069.2024.2381006.
[60] Kleinhans 2017. False promises of co-production in neighbourhood regeneration: the case of Dutch community enterprises. Public Management Review 19(10), 1500–1518. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2017.1287941
[61] Kloosterman & Akkermans 2022. Duurzaam denken en duurzaam doen. Verschillen tussen jong en oud. Geron 24(4). https://edu.nl/7rtpu
[62] Klösters, Paradies, Schlindwein & Batenburg 2022. Burgers over klimaatbeleid. Een onderzoek naar zorgen en oplossingen. TNO report 2022-P10568. https://edu.nl/f6xwb
[63] Koudenburg, Postmes, Gordijn & van Mourik Broekman 2015. Uniform and Complementary Social Interaction: Distinct Pathways to Solidarity. PLoS ONE 10(6). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129061
[64] Leach, Stirling, & Scoones 2010. Dynamic Sustainabilities: Technology, Environment, Social Justice. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781849775069
[65] Loorbach, Wittmayer, Avelino, von Wirth & Frantzeskaki. Transformative innovation and translocal diffusion. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 35, 251-260. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2020.01.009
[66] Mahieu & Van Caudenberg 2020. Young refugees and locals living under the same roof: intercultural communal living as a catalyst for refugees’ integration in European urban communities?. Comparitative Migration Studies 8, 12. DOI: 10.1186/s40878-019-0168-9
[67] Melucci, A. 2013. The process of collective identity. In: Challenging Codes: Collective Action in the Information Age. Cambridge Cultural Social Studies. Cambridge University Press, 68-86. https://edu.nl/3w7t4
[67a] Melucci et al. 1995. Social Movements and Culture. NED-New edition, vol. 4, University of Minnesota Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctttt0p8
[68] Michels 2011. Innovations in democratic governance: how does citizen participation contribute to a better democracy? International Review of Administrative Sciences 77(2), 275-293. DOI: 10.1177/0020852311399851
[69] Migchelbrink & Van de Walle 2021. A systematic review of the literature on determinants of public managers’ attitudes toward public participation. Local Government Studies 48(1), 1–22. DOI: 10.1080/03003930.2021.1885379
[70] Miltenburg, Geurkink, Tunderman, Beekers & den Ridder 2022. Burgerperspectieven 2022:2. https://edu.nl/d7m69
[71] Newell, Geels & Sovacool 2022. Navigating tensions between rapid and just low-carbon transitions. Environmental Research Letters 17:041006. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac622a
[72] Novkovic & Golja 2015. Cooperatives and Civil Society: Potential for Local Cooperative Development in Croatia, Journal of Entrepreneurial and Organizational Diversity 4(1), 153-169. DOI: 10.5947/jeod.2015.008
[73] Olsthoorn, Ras, van der Torre & Wildeboer Schut 2017. Voorzieningen verdeeld. Profijt van de overheid. https://edu.nl/w8xj6
[74] Oomen, Hoffman, Hajer 2022. Techniques of futuring: On how imagined futures become socially performative. European Journal of Social Theory 25(2), 252-270. DOI: 10.1177/1368431020988826
[75] Ostrom 2009. A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems. Science 325, 419-422. DOI: 10.1126/science.1172133
[76] Pateman 1970. Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511720444
[77] Pedersen & Johannsen 2016. Where and How You Sit: How Civil Servants View Citizens’ Participation. Administration & Society 48(1), 104-129. DOI: 10.1177/0095399714555753
[78] Pel 2021. Transition ‘backlash’: Towards explanation, governance and critical understanding. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 41, 32-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2021.10.016
[79] Pera & Bussu 2024. Towards Democratisation of Public Administration: Public-Commons Partnerships in Barcelona. International Journal of the Commons 18(1), 164–176. DOI: 10.5334/ijc.1385
[80] Perlaviciute 2022. Contested climate policies and the four Ds of public participation: From normative standards to what people want. WIREs Climate Change 13:1, e749. DOI: 10.1002/wcc.749
[81] Pina, Torres & Bachiller 2016. Political Influence and the Performance of Nonprofit Spanish Banks. Nonprofit Management & Leadership 26(4), 471-488. DOI: 10.1002/nml.21205
[82] Postmes, Spears, Lee & Novak 2005. Individuality and Social Influence in Groups: Inductive and Deductive Routes to Group Identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(5), 747–763. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.5.747
[83] Poteete & Ostrom 2008. Fifteen Years of Empirical Research on Collective Action in Natural Resource Management: Struggling to Build Large-N Databases Based on Qualitative Research.
World Development 36:1, 176-195. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.02.012
[84] Rebelo 2024. Sustainable place-shaping processes for activating more inclusive and bottom-up participation in place branding. PhD Thesis, Cardiff University. https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/170620
[85] Sadeghlou & Emami 2023. Residential preferences and satisfaction: a qualitative study using means-end chain theory. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 38, 1711–1734. DOI: 10.1007/s10901-023-10017-1
[86] Savini 2023. Maintaining autonomy: Urban degrowth and the commoning of housing. Urban Studies 60(7), 1231-1248. DOI: 10.1177/00420980221121517
[87] Schlager 2016. Introducing the The Importance of Context, Scale, and Interdependencies in Understanding and Applying Ostrom’s Design Principles for Successful Governance of the Commons. International Journal of the Commons 10:2, 405-416. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26522872
[88] Schreuder & Horlings 2022. Transforming places together: transformative community strategies responding to climate change and sustainability challenges. Climate Action 1:24. DOI: 10.1007/s44168-022-00024-3
[89] Schütz, Heidingsfelder & Schraudner 2019. Co-shaping the Future in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems: Uncovering Public Preferences toward Participatory Research and Innovation. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation 5:2, 128-146. DOI: 10.1016/j.sheji.2019.04.002
[90] Schwanitz, Wierling, Arghandeh Paudler, von Beck, Dufner, Knutsdotter Koren, Kraudzun, Marcroft, Mueller & Zeiss 2023. Statistical evidence for the contribution of citizen-led initiatives and projects to the energy transition in Europe. Scientific Report 13, 1342. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-28504-4
[91] Seyfang & Smith 2007. Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: Towards a new research and policy agenda. Environmental Politics 16(4), 584–603. DOI: 10.1080/09644010701419121
[92] Seyfang et al. 2012. Growing Grassroots Innovations: Exploring the Role of Community-Based Initiatives in Governing Sustainable Energy Transitions. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 30(3), 381-400. DOI: 10.1068/c10222
[93] Slingerland, Kooijman, Lukosch, Comes & Brazier 2021. The power of stories: A framework to orchestrate reflection in urban storytelling to form stronger communities. Community Development 54(1), 18–37. DOI: 10.1080/15575330.2021.1998169
[94] Sloot, Jans & Steg 2018. Can community energy initiatives motivate sustainable energy behaviours? The role of initiative involvement and personal pro-environmental motivation. Journal of Environmental Psychology 57, 99-106. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.06.007
[95] Soares da Silva, Horlings & Figueiredo 2018. Citizen Initiatives in the Post-Welfare State. Social Sciences 7:12, 252. DOI: 10.3390/socsci7120252
[96] Spekkink, Rödl & Charter. Repair Cafés and Precious Plastic as translocal networks for the circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production 380(2), 135125. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135125
[97] Steg 2016. Values, Norms, and Intrinsic Motivation to Act Proenvironmentally. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 41, 277-292 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085947
[98] Timming & Summers 2020. Is workplace democracy associated with wider pro-democracy affect? A structural equation model. Economic and Industrial Democracy 41(3), 709-726. DOI: 10.1177/0143831X17744028
[99] Torfing, Ferlie, Jukić & Ongaro 2021. A theoretical framework for studying the co-creation of innovative solutions and public value. Policy & Politics 49(2), 189-209. DOI: 10.1332/030557321X16108172803520
[100] Tajfel & Turner 1979. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. ISBN 9780818502781
[101] Turner 1991. Social influence. Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co. https://edu.nl/366k9
[102] Van Arkel & Tromp 2024. What Do Designers Bring To The Table? Identifying Key Design Competencies When Designing For Societal Challenges In The Public Sector. DRS2024 Research Paper. DOI: 10.21606/drs.2024.370
[103] Van de Grift, Cuppen & Spruit, 2020. Co-creation, control or compliance? How Dutch community engagement professionals view their work. Energy Research & Social Science 60, 101323 DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2019.101323
[104] Van Eijk et al. 2013. Why People Co-Produce: Analysing citizens’ perceptions on co-planning engagement in health care services. Public Management Review 16(3), 358-382. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2013.841458
[105] Van Klingeren & De Moor 2024. Ecological, financial, social and societal motives for cooperative energy prosumerism: measuring preference heterogeneity in a Belgian energy cooperative. Energy, Sustainability and Society 14, 13. DOI: 10.1186/s13705-024-00444-5
[106] Vermeulen & Maas 2020. The Social Impact of Corporate Citizenship Programs on Their Beneficiaries and Society at Large: A Case Study. In: Roza, Bethmann, Meijs & von Schnurbein eds. Handbook on Corporate Foundations. Nonprofit and Civil Society Studies. Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-25759-0_11
[107] Voorberg, Bekkers & Tummers. 2014. A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review 17:9, 1333-1357. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2014.930505
[108] Wagenaar 2009. Commentary: Recovering Public Ethos: Critical Analysis for Policy and Planning. Planning Theory & Practice 10:3. DOI: 10.1080/14649350903229828
[109] Wittmayer, Backhaus, Avelino, Pel, Strasser, Kunze, & Zuijderwijk 2019. Narratives of change: How social innovation initiatives construct societal transformation. Futures 112, 102433. DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2019.06.005
[110] Wittmayer, Hielscher, Rogge, & Weber 2024. Advancing the understanding of social innovation in sustainability transitions: exploring processes, politics, and policies for accelerating transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 50, 100805. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2023.100805
[111] Zhang & Feeney 2018. Managerial Ambivalence and Electronic Civic Engagement: The Role of Public Manager Beliefs and Perceived Needs. Public Administration Review 78:1. DOI: 10.1111/puar.12853

Literature list

Delen